New Study Finds Heavy Cell Phone Use Can Increase Your Risk Of Deadly Brain Cancer by 300% - Plus Four Simple Tips For Increased Safety - Herbs Info

New Study Finds Heavy Cell Phone Use Can Increase Your Risk Of Deadly Brain Cancer by 300% – Plus Four Simple Tips For Increased Safety

Please Share This Page:

Please be sure to Join our email list and receive all our latest tutorials daily – free!

New Study Finds Heavy Cell Phone Use Can Increase Your Risk Of Deadly Brain Cancer
Photo (under license) – © Innovated Captures – fotolia.com



The use of mobile devices has increased exponentially since the introduction of smartphones. With mobile phone subscriptions hitting close to 7 billion globally [1], our exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) is higher than ever. This has raised concerns regarding the effect of RF-EMF on humans, particularly their risk for cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified RF-EMF as possibly carcinogenic, because of a higher risk for gliomas, a type of brain cancer. [2] While these statistics indicate possible dangers RF-EMF, fully understanding how it affects a person’s health needs further research and study.

Daily Exposure to RF-EMF



Radiofrequency is emitted by all hand-held electronic devices, such as mobile phones, tablets, and laptops. In occupations where people work with broadcast antennas, cellular towers, and medical equipment, the exposure to RF-EMF is higher. The RF energy from these devices appears to affect some people more than others. Because the body sends information through the nervous system by sending electrical impulses to brain, it can be surmised that RF-EMF has an effect on human cells and tissue, no matter how small. [3]
Dindic, et. al.’s review published in 2013 detailed how RF-EMF could potentially damage cells. While the National Cancer Institute states that RF-EMF only heats cells, not damage DNA (which is need for carcinogenesis) [4], Dindic, et. al. begs to differ. According to their review, cells that are exposed to RF-EMF experience high levels of oxidative stress. Because of this, free radicals become present in the blood, one of which is peroxynitrite, a very aggressive free radical that is able to break single-strand DNA – which can ultimately cause cancer. [5]

Three-fold Increase in Cancer Risk
One of the most troubling recent studies explaining the risk of RF-EMF was published in the latter half of 2014 by Hardell and Carlberg [6]. They analyzed the long-term effects of mobile and cordless phone use on the risk for gliomas. They based their study on previous research by the IARC in 2011, where RF-EMF was classified as possible carcinogenic [2]. Since the IARC study only covered a short latency period of 10 years, Hardell and Carlberg extended their study to include a 25-year latency period.

The study used two case-control studies, with patient diagnoses made between 1997-2003 and 2007-2009 in six Swedish oncology centers. The respondents were aged 20 to 80 years and 18-75 years for each group. Diagnosed patients were mailed questionnaires, which assess their exposure. Hardell and Carlberg’s results were conclusive – use of mobile and cordless phones were directly associated with increased risk for glioma, with the risk increasing as the latency period and cumulative use of the devices increased. In fact, the group with greater than 25 years of mobile and cordless phone use had a three-fold increased risk compared to users with less than 12 months exposure to same devices.

While the study has directly associated cell phone use to cancer risk, the risk, in actuality, is very small. When put into perspective – Sweden is one of the countries with the lowest annual mortality rates for cancer (less than 150 per 100,000 population in 2010 [7]). The rates for brain cancer are even smaller. With the risk at roughly 0.15 percent, even when tripled, it is still quite small. Still, the results of the study are significant enough to shed light on how dangerous RF-EMF can be.

Inconsistency Between Different Studies
Despite the IARCs formal endorsement of RF-EMF as possibly carcinogenic, the premise is still widely debated in the scientific community because of inconsistent findings among different studies. A Danish study in 2011 by Frei, et. al. [8] revealed no increase risk for tumors with mobile phone use. However, Frei, et. al. used data based on mobile subscription instead of actual usage which ultimately affected their results. A US-based program in 2012 [9] tracked cancer incidence in the country and found that there was no significant increase despite the increase in mobile phone and electric gadget use between 1987 and 2007. Because of these studies, the National Cancer Institute concluded that there isn’t strong evidence to prove the causational relationship between RF-EMF and cancer [4] – this implies that more research has to be done to further build on that premise.



However, Hardell and Carlberg’s study is not the only one linking RF-EMF with cancer. A study in 2004 revealed that mobile phone use of at least 10 years increased the risk of acquiring acoustic neuroma. [10] Another study in 2009 revealed a positive association between mobile phone us and the development of parotid gland tumors. [11] In 2013, Bhat, Kumar, and Gupta analyzed published studies on mobile phone use and cancer risk, concluding that long term, low intensity exposure to radiation from mobile devices could potentially lead to tumor formation. [12]

Hardell and Carlberg published a further study in 2014 which focused on the effects of mobile phone use on people previously diagnosed with gliomas – and the results weren’t good. The study analyzed more than 1500 glioma patients and revealed decreased survival rates with long-term mobile phone use. As the latency period of use increased, so did the hazard ratio for patients diagnosed with a stage IV glioblastoma. Highest HR was noted in patients who started using mobile phones before 20 years of age. [13]

Four Simple Tips For What You Can Do
It goes without saying that communication is very important in today’s fast-moving world. It’s extremely difficult to live completely disconnected from the modern world and the hardships that this might impose often outweigh the risks associated with modern life. Here are a few common sense tips for risk reduction:

1) Limit cell phone use, especially long calls.
2) Keep a greater physical distance between the device and your head when on the phone. For example use speakerphone or an “air tube” headset. Also it’s better if possible to have the phone turned up louder and held further away from your head during regular calling. Even an inch further away may be helpful as the RF is strongest right next to the device.
3) Rather than keeping the phone in a pocket when not on a call, keep your phone in a bag or in another location not attached to your person. Smart phones are transmitting and receiving data even when you are not making a call.
4) Consider limiting children’s access to mobile devices to scenarios where they would be valuable for increased safety. Long term use appears to present the greatest risk.

References:

[1] World Health Organization (2014). Electromagnetic fields and public health: mobile phones. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs193/en/

[2] International Agency for Research on Cancer (2011). IARC Classified Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields As Possibly Carcinogenic To Humans. http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf

[3] Baan, R., et. al. (2011). Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency of electromagnetic fields. http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(11)70147-4/fulltext

[4] National Cancer Institute (2013). Cell Phones and Cancer Risk. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/causes-prevention/risk-factors/radiation/cell-phones-fact-sheet

[5] Dindic, B., et. al. (2013). Cytogenetic Damages Induced by Chronic Exposure to Microwave Non-ionizing Radiofrequency Fields. http://publisher.medfak.ni.ac.rs/2013-html/4-broj/Boris%20Djindjic-Citogenetic.pdf

[6] Hardell, L. & Carlberg, M. (2014). Mobile phone and cordless phone use and the risk for glioma – Analysis of pooled case-control studies in Sweden, 1997-2003 and 2007-2009. http://www.pathophysiologyjournal.com/article/S0928-4680(14)00064-9/fulltext

[7] Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Health at a Glance: Europe 2012. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/9789264183896-en/01/05/index.html?itemId=/content/chapter/9789264183896-8-en

[8] Frei, P., et. al. (2011). Use of mobile phones and risk of brain tumors: update on Danish cohort study. http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d6387

[9] Little, M., et. al. (2012) Mobile phone and glioma risk: comparison of epidemiological study results with incidence trends in the United States. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22403263

[10] Lonn, S., et. al. (2004). Mobile Phone Use and the Risk of Acoustic Neuroma. http://journals.lww.com/epidem/Abstract/2004/11000/Mobile_Phone_Use_and_the_Risk_of_Acoustic_Neuroma.3.aspx

[11] Sadetzki, S., et. al. (2007). Cellular Phone Use and Risk of Benign and Malignant Parotid Gland Tumors – A Nationwide Case-Control Study. http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/167/4/457.short

[12] Bhat, M., Kumar, V. & Gupta, G. (2013). Exposure of Electromagnetic Radiation from Mobile Phone Communication Systems for Long Time Provokes Cancer Growth. http://www.journalijar.com/uploads/2013-09-03_142833_123.pdf

[13] Hardell, L. & Carlberg, M. (2014). Decreased survival of glioma patients with Astrocytoma Grave IV Associated with Long-Term Use of Mobile and Cordless Phones. http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/10/10790



I Can't Help Showing This Off:

If you haven't heard of Claude Davis yet do yourself a huge favor and watch this video. He's going to be the talk of 2017.

One of the smartest guys I ever had the pleasure of meeting, Claude set-up a unique system that changed his life forever.

I already tried it myself and let me tell... you I was completely blown away... His surprising tactics could make your life easier and give you the peace of mind you deserve.

Don't just take my word for it... watch his short video and decide for yourself.

>>> Watch His Short Video <<<


The #1 Muscle That Eliminates Joint And Back Pain, Anxiety And Looking Fat

By Mike Westerdal CPT

Can you guess which muscle in your body is the #1 muscle that eliminates joint and back pain, anxiety and looking fat?

This is especially important if you spend a significant amount of time sitting every day (I do, and this really affects me in a big way!)

Working this "hidden survival muscle" that most people are simply not training because no-one ever taught them how will boost your body shape, energy levels, immune system, sexual function, strength and athletic performance when unlocked.

If this "hidden" most powerful primal muscle is healthy, we are healthy.

Is it...

a) Abs

b) Chest

c) Glutes

d) Hip Flexors

Take the quiz above and see if you got the correct answer!

P.S. Make sure you check out this page to get to know the 10 simple moves that will bring vitality back into your life:

==> Click here to discover which "hidden survival muscle" will help you boost your energy levels, immune system, sexual function, strength and athletic performance permanently!


Everyone knows green smoothies are healthy, right? However…

Have you heard of a “red” smoothie? If not, check out this story…
The Red Smoothie Detox Factor
=> “Red” Smoothie Helps Alabama Girl Shed 80lbs!



  1. Famous Chef Sheds 60lbs Researching New Paleo Recipes: Get The Cookbook FREE Here
  2. #1 muscle that eliminates joint and back pain, anxiety and looking fat
  3. Amazing Free Numerology Report
  4. [PROOF] Reverse Diabetes with a “Pancreas Jumpstart”
  5. 7 odd foods that KILL your abdominal fat (surprising fat-fighters)
  6. Here's What Happens When You "Unlock Your Hip Flexors"
  7. The #1 WORST food that CAUSES Faster Aging  (beware -- Are you eating this?)





If you enjoyed this page:

Please Share This Page:



1 Comment

  • By nice information to follow, April 3, 2015 @ 8:52 pm

    nice information

Other Links to this Post

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment